This survey was carried out January 23–29, 2020 with a representative sample of all Russian urban and rural residents. The sample comprised 1603 people age 18 or older from 137 localities in 50 regions of the Russian Federation. The survey was conducted as a personal interview in respondents’ homes. The answer distribution is presented as a percentage of the number of participants.
The statistical error of these studies for a selection of 1600 people (with a probability of 0.95) does not exceed:
3.4% for indicators around 50%
2.9% for indicators around 25%/75%
2.0% for indicators around 10%/90%
1.5% for indicators around 5%/95%
IN YOUR OPINION, HAS THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT UNDER DIMITRY MEDVEDEV BEEN ABLE TO IMPROVE THE SITUATION IN THE COUNTRY DURING ITS TERM? (one answer)
Jan. 20 | |
Definitely yes | 3 |
Probably yes | 19 |
Probably not | 36 |
Definitely not | 38 |
It is difficult to say | 4 |
HAD YOU EVER HEARD OF MIKHAIL MISHUSTIN BEFORE VLADIMIR PUTIN NOMINATED HIM AS A CANDIDATE FOR PRIME MINISTER OF RUSSIA? (one answer)
Jan. 20 | |
Yes, I had heard of him | 15 |
No, I had not | 85 |
It is difficult to say | <1 |
WHAT DO YOU THINK IS THE MOST LIKELY OUTCOME FOLLOWING THE CHANGES THAT TOOK PLACE IN THE GOVERNMENT: AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE SITUATION IN THE COUNTRY, A WORSENING OF THE SITUATION IN THE COUNTRY, OR DO YOU THINK THE SITUATION IN THE COUNTRY WILL NOT CHANGE AS A RESULT OF THESE CHANGES IN THE GOVERNMENT? (one answer)
Total sample | As a percentage of respondents that have heard of Mikhail Mishustin; one answer) | As a percentage of respondents that HAVE NOT heard of Mikhail Mishustin; one answer) | |
Improvement | 38 | 52 | 35 |
Worsening | 9 | 13 | 9 |
The situation will not change | 46 | 30 | 49 |
It is difficult to say | 7 | 4 | 7 |
Translated by Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey (formerly Monterey Institute of International Studies).
The ANO Levada Center has been included in the registry of non-commercial organizations acting as foreign agents. Read the Director of the Levada Center’s statement of disagreement with this decision here.